Ireland vs the UK: Comparing Evolving Gambling Markets
AffPapa Awards LATAM 2026 — REGISTER
SponsorSponsor

Ireland vs the UK: Comparing Two Evolving Gambling Markets

Operators and affiliates weighing where to allocate resources across Ireland and the UK face two markets in active regulatory transition, but on very different timelines.

Ireland vs the UK: Comparing Two Evolving Gambling Markets

The UK’s framework has matured over nearly two decades and is now being tightened further, while Ireland is only now replacing legislation that predates the internet. NetBet Ireland illustrates the point: operators already established there face a very different compliance trajectory than counterparts in the UK.

Understanding where each jurisdiction stands, and where it is heading, matters for anyone planning market entry or reassessing an existing footprint.

The UK: A Mature Market Under Fresh Pressure

The UK Gambling Commission regulates the UK’s gambling industry under the Gambling Act 2005, which sits within the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. That structure has been in place long enough to produce a deep body of guidance and enforcement precedent, but 2025 brought some of the most significant changes to the regime in years.

From 6 April 2025, a statutory levy replaced the voluntary contribution system that had underpinned research, education, and treatment funding: 1.1% of Gross Gambling Yield for online operators, 0.5% for land-based.

Affordability checks became mandatory from 28 February 2025 for customers depositing £150 or more per month. Slot stake limits followed on 9 April 2025, capping online spins at £5 for players aged 25 and over and £2 for those aged 18 to 24. From 31 October 2025, operators must prompt customers with deposit-limit options before their first deposit. GamStop remains mandatory across all licensees, giving the UK a single, established self-exclusion system that Ireland has not yet matched.

Ireland: A Generational Leap From 1930s Legislation

Ireland’s starting point looks almost nothing like the UK’s. Until recently, the sector operated under the Betting Act 1931 and the Gaming and Lotteries Act 1956, administered by the Revenue Commissioners largely as a licensing and tax function rather than a modern regulatory one. The Gambling Regulation Act 2024 changed that by creating the Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland, formally established on 5 March 2025 under CEO Anne Marie Caulfield. Unlike the UK’s Commission, GRAI sits under the Department of Justice, a structural choice that signals a harder enforcement posture from the outset.

The rollout is still in progress. From 1 July 2026, remote operators must hold a B2C Betting Licence issued by GRAI, with the previous Revenue Commissioners’ licences expiring on that date.

GRAI’s penalty powers are substantial: fines of the greater of 10% of turnover or €20 million, backed by criminal enforcement authority well beyond what the Revenue Commissioners held under the old system. Advertising is already more restricted than in the UK, with a ban on gambling advertising across TV and radio between 5:30 am and 9 pm, alongside a credit card gambling ban built into the new framework.

Some infrastructure is still catching up to the legislation. A National Gambling Exclusion Register, Ireland’s answer to GamStop, was being built but was not yet fully operational as of mid-2026. A Social Impact Fund, financed through industry levies, is projected to generate at least €14 million annually according to GRAI’s Strategy 2025–2027. Ireland’s overall gambling revenue exceeded €2.5 billion in 2025, a meaningful scale even as the regulatory apparatus is still being assembled.

Structural Differences That Matter for Market Entry

Beyond the headline dates, the two regimes differ in ways that affect day-to-day strategy. Ireland’s placement of GRAI under Justice points toward a regulator more inclined to treat breaches as matters for criminal referral, not just fines. The UK’s DCMS oversight, by contrast, has produced a regime that leans on financial penalties, licence conditions, and audits, as the NetBet settlement demonstrates.

Advertising is another point of divergence. Ireland’s broadcast watershed is stricter than anything currently mandated in the UK, which relies more on advertising codes and UKGC licence conditions. Messaging that clears UK compliance checks may still need adjustment for Ireland.

One distinction matters most for operators targeting online gaming verticals: Ireland’s initial GRAI licensing phase is focused on betting, with B2C gaming licences arriving in a later phase. That timing gap is a near-term consideration for anyone whose strategy centres on iGaming products rather than sports betting, since the licensing pathway for that side of the Irish market is not yet fully defined.

What This Means Going Forward

Both markets are tightening, but from different starting points and at different speeds. The UK is refining an already mature system, layering affordability checks and stake limits onto a regime with established GamStop coverage, levy funding, and years of enforcement history. Ireland is building that infrastructure from close to zero, moving from 1930s-era Revenue Commissioners oversight to a dedicated regulator with criminal enforcement powers within a few years.

For operators and affiliates, the takeaway is that compliance requirements in each market need to be tracked on their own timeline rather than assumed to run in parallel. Ireland’s exclusion register and gaming licensing phase remain works in progress, while the UK’s 2025 changes are already fully in force. Anyone operating across both jurisdictions will need distinct compliance and marketing playbooks for each.

Lilit Sarinyan
Content Writer

With 3 years of experience in iGaming, I focus on producing content that helps readers make sense of developments across the sector. My work includes interviews with industry professionals, regional market analysis, affiliate industry developments, and detailed reviews. With a particular interest in how iGaming is evolving and where it’s headed next, my degree in English and Communication has shaped how I approach writing, especially when it comes to making complex topics easy to follow.