Vyking joins AffPapa Conference Madrid 2026 as an exhibitor to connect with industry professionals and build partnerships at booth №8.Vyking is an end-to-end iGaming B2B...
Why players think differently in the CIS vs Tier-1 markets
Replicating the same traffic campaign in the CIS and Tier-1 markets often doesn’t bring the anticipated results, as conversions drop, deposits slow down, and many of the users churn before registering.
The problem is that different markets require different user mindsets, and not understanding this can become a costly mistake.
One user, two behaviors
The difference between Tier-1 and CIS markets can be observed in Statista and H2 Gambling Capital data.
Tier-1 markets:
- 30-50% longer time to first deposit
- 20-40% higher LTV
- Lower registration conversion
CIS markets:
- Fast registration
- Fast deposits
- Shorter lifecycle
Bundle Mafia said:
“Tier‑1 users are ‘burned out’: they’ve seen thousands of creatives and funnels and respond poorly to simplistic approaches. You need trust, native messaging, and more sophisticated campaigns. CIS audiences are less saturated; campaigns that worked 2–3 years ago in Tier‑1 still perform well here.”
This means that you’re practically selling to two different ways of thinking.
Aggressive creatives and why they fail
PwC data shows that more than 70% of European users check terms, licenses, and reputation before depositing, but these barriers are much lower in the CIS.
Bundle Mafia noted:
“Simply porting a working CIS campaign to Tier‑1 is a costly mistake. Traffic costs are higher, and ROI may disappoint advertisers.”
Tier-1 players tend to visit the same site many times, compare offers, and read terms before making deposits, as this translates into longer ROI cycles, more working capital requirements, and clearer analytics.
Bundle Mafia stressed:
“Ignoring this leads to cash flow gaps and campaigns shutting down before they can become profitable.”
The importance of UX
Reports from Google suggest that raising page load time from 1 to 3 seconds can increase bounce probability by 32%, and while in the CIS this might go unnoticed, in Tier-1 it will lead to immediate traffic loss.
Bundle Mafia commented:
“Campaigns that work on less demanding markets often simply don’t survive in Tier‑1.”
Why the market learns the wrong lessons
A lot of published case studies hide their failed tests, hypotheses that didn’t work, or how the audience behavior changed, which can create a perception of transferability.
Bundle Mafia stated:
“Real differences in user behavior are rarely discussed publicly. They’re dissected behind the scenes at conferences like MAC, where teams analyze failures and why campaigns stop working in new markets.”
Real insights and where they come from
Buyers, products, teams, and affiliates exchange information, which is faster and cheaper compared to learning through error and trial.
Bundle Mafia added:
“At MAC, informal conversations reveal behavioral differences and economics in new geos that no spreadsheet or case study can show.”
Tips for scaling
There are three tips to follow in order to succeed in Tier-1 markets:
- Treat each GEO as a unique market and avoid direct replication
- Take into consideration deposit timing, trust levels, and product sensitivity
- Use external context to validate against the market instead of relying on internal assumptions only
Bundle Mafia shared:
“The key to success is understanding the audience mindset and tailoring the approach to each market. ROI improves, and mistakes stop costing hundreds of thousands of dollars.”
Conclusion
It can be concluded that user behavior is the main difference between CIS and Tier-1 markets. Behavior also drives budgets, with teams that understand audience psychology reaching profitability faster, while those that don’t are left to pay the price themselves.
In affiliate marketing, success still largely depends on trust, how quickly people connect, and the quality of the relationships behind the deals. That’s exactly why MAC...
